In my opinion, one of the most important points in the article is that the relentless bashing which has become a recurring feature of many reviews will, inevitably, hurt the entire research field, because it destroys the scientific community in that field.
As I said before, I think that an open peer review process with identifiable reviewers will foster constructive criticism in the reviews. The reviewers will become visible and their contribution to the community acknowledged. The whole process will become more transparent, which is a prerequisite for a functioning scientific community.
